ADEC Logo

Skip Navigational Menu and go to Main Page Content
What's New
About ADEC
Privacy Policy
Security and Privacy
Shop at the ADEC E-Store
IDEAL
Learning Resources
Courseware Tools
Satellite Resources
Federal Programs and Grants
Agricultural Telecommunications
NSF Project
eArmyU
Internet and Electronic Trends
Accessability Issues
Standards and Plans
International Cooperation
Conferences and Workshops
Virtual Universities
Internal Management
Search
Help
Distance Education... Distance Education... Distance Education...

In the land of...BETA, VHS and MTV

By: Scott Fedale, Janet Poley, Jeff Poley

January 30, 1998
Dallas, Texas


Goals for today’s talk
  • Understand convergence and interoperability
  • Understand Harvard Business School model
  • Develop & review of ADEC options & choices
  • Decisions ?

    What is ADEC’s Strength?
  • Content
  • Content
  • Content

    So How Do We Maximize our Strength?


    Challenge
  • How can ADEC most efficiently deliver the content that we package to our audiences?

    Harvard Business School Model
  • content
  • packaging
  • transmission network
  • manipulation infrastructure
  • terminals

    What's Going On?
  • Convergence of:
    • 1890’S - TELEPHONE
    • 1930’S - TELEVISION
    • 1980’S - COMPUTING

    The changing structure
  • Now:
    • content-specific distribution, provided by unique technologies, hardware and methods
  • Future:
    • content-independent distribution, provided by a common infrastructure

    Content
  • Communities of interest/dominant market position
  • Will capture more of total industry value
  • But will remain a collection of largely independent businesses

    Packaging
  • 2 Types
    • technically oriented systems integrator
    • distribution packagers
      • MTV, AOL, ADEC

    Caveat
  • If you don’t control the packaging of your content, you risk losing intellectual property rights

    Transmission
  • How can ADEC most efficiently deliver the content we package?
  • Options?
    • Bid w/ commercial providers
    • Aggregate our own demand for most bandwidth/least cost

    Manipulation
  • Software in the network
  • Other software
  • ADEC needs to influence how this develops
  • We need to do the manipulation, not be manipulated

    Terminals
  • Convergence of present options
    • ex.-set-top boxes
  • Appliances will replace the old proprietary ones
    • (phone, computer, tv)
  • IRD’s via commerce match

    Importance of "first mover" advantage
  • If we’re not providing it, someone else will!
  • Partnerships made now will pay off in long term
  • Earlier we partner, more advantage to ADEC

    Why "Provide Our Own"?
  • We Control:
    • Aggregating our content
    • Packaging our content
    • Cost of transmission
    • Marketing

    Standards and Interoperability?
  • Move towards common transmission platform results in issues of proprietory standards
    • Ex.-digital compression-
      • Europe/U.S.
      • In U.S.-Digicyper/Magnitude/Weggener/ Spectrum Saver/Powerview

    Options for ADEC
  • Continuum from collaboration, capacity building, etc. to aggregated content and marketing.
    • ( MTV model )

    Decisions?
  • Current behavior not economical
    • Proprietary standards, equipment
    • State designed tranmission systems
    • Lots of individual, small buys of time-wired/wireless
    • Duplication of programming
    • Chasing small $$$$$
    • Not making a decision is a decision!

    Results of No Decision
  • Limits our ability to take part in:
    • Allocation of digital spectrum
    • 4-7 % Educational allocation on DBS
    • Public interest/education-commercial broadcast digital tv
    • Internet II
    • Rural Access
    • Increased program distribution

    So What Do We Recommend?
  • Raise investment capital to develop shared system
  • More human capital in programming, marketing, management

  • ????????????????????????????
  •  

      E-mail Site Manager:
    webmaster@adec.edu
    Last Updated: June 20, 2002