Re-engineering the Land Grant
College of Agriculture

by James H. Meyer


Executive Summary

The original LGCA was built from the ground up, state by state, not from the top down, and was based upon a concern for agriculture of the times that is no longer valid today. The makeup and variability of agriculture and its related industries and of the natural environments from one state to the next are so great and complex that they mandate re-engineering this college to meet each individual state's requirements today and for the future. The method I chose to examine the problem and its solutions was to study the literature and consult with colleagues who have experience as administrators, consultants and writers of research papers on the subject of the future of the LGCA. I concluded that the college needs extensive re-engineering.

What is required is two-fold: 1) A well-thought-out process for re-engineering the organization, with 2) a leader, that is, the dean, who stays in office for at least ten years, in order for plans to be developed and restructuring of the organization to be realized.

Some suggestions are as follows:

Re-engineering the LGCA requires recognition of two separate internal decision-makers with final authority, at the academic and administrative levels. These are the faculty, who decide for the most part what to teach and what to research, and the administration, which oversees and administers the campus.


For a hard copy of the complete text, please contact Dr. Meyer via e-mail at jhmeyer@ucdavis.edu. He will be happy to send you a copy, free of charge.