QUALITY FRAMEWORK FOR ONLINE EDUCATION

The quality framework is a tool for continuously improving online programs in higher education.  Based on recommendations of the higher education community,[1] the quality framework provides ways of demonstrating institutional quality.  As institutions continuously improve pedagogy, and as technology evolves, the framework itself is a work in progress, designed to facilitate the sharing of effective practices among institutions.  Readers are invited to comment on the framework and to share effective practices at:

http://www.sloanconsortium.org/effectivepractices

Specific structures, known as the five pillars of quality, support the quality framework-- learning effectiveness, access, student satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, and cost effectiveness. For each of the pillars, the framework enables institutions to set the goals, to identify supporting practices, and to project and measure progress towards the goals. (An example framework is tabularized at the end of this document).  The pillars of the quality framework are to be understood and applied by each institution as appropriate to its distinctive quality.  These are the pillars of the quality framework:

 LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS means that learners who complete an online program receive educations that represent the distinctive quality of the institution.  The goal is that online learning is equivalent to or better than learning through the institution’s other delivery modes, in particular through its traditional face-to-face, classroom-based instruction. The course or program is designed to be at least equivalent in quality to face-to-face courses offered at the same institution.  If there is no comparable face-to-face course, then the institution’s normative benchmark applies.  The learning resources in online courses generally include the same ones to be found in the institution’s traditional face-to-face courses-- learning media (books, notes, software, CD-ROMs, and so on); faculty who teach the class and are available outside of class; and learners who interact with the faculty and with each other.  Because of technology, online courses are usually enhanced by resources available over the Internet and/or designed for computer presentation.  Metrics demonstrate that the quality of learning online is at least as good as the institution provides through its traditional programs as measured by several means—by faculty perception; by outcomes assessments; by career, scholastic and professional achievement surveys and records; by feedback from employers; and by institutionally sustained, evidence-based, participatory inquiry into how well online programs achieve learning objectives.  Online learning generally parallels the quality of face-to-face learning with equivalent content, standards, and support services.  Online curricula are subject to, and thereby receive the same benefits of practice, process and criteria that the institution applies to traditional forms of instruction.

These principles of effective online education address LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS:

  • Academic standards for all online programs or courses are the same as those for other courses or programs delivered at the institution where they originate.
  • Online degrees, certificate programs, and courses are coherent and complete.
  • Each program or course of study results in learning appropriate to the rigor and breadth of the degree or certificate awarded.
  • Learning in online programs or courses is comparable to learning in programs or courses offered at the campus where they originate.
  • The institution has admission/acceptance criteria to assess whether the learner has the background, knowledge and technical skills required for undertaking the course program.
  • The institution uses evaluation results for continuous program improvement.
  • The program or course provides learners with clear, complete and timely information on the curriculum, course and degree requirements, nature of faculty/learner interaction, prerequisite technology competencies and skills, technical equipment requirements, availability of academic support services, financial aid resources, and costs and payment policies.
  • The course or program provides for interaction between faculty and learners and among learners that is both quantitatively and qualitatively sufficient to support course objectives and that is in accordance with the pedagogy and subject matter of the course.  Interaction encourages critical thinking, problem solving, analysis, integration and synthesis, as defined in the course objectives.
  • Qualified faculty supervise the online program or course, as they do for other modes of instruction.

STUDENT SATISFACTION Student satisfaction is the most important key to continuing learning.  It reflects learners’ evaluation of the quality of all aspects of the educational program.  The goal is that all learners who complete online courses with the same institution express satisfaction with course quality, with faculty and peer interaction, and with support services.  Online learners put a primary value on constructive, substantive interaction with faculty and, as appropriate, with classmates in classes that are the same size as equivalent face-to-face classes and are taught by the same kind of faculty.People-to-people interaction is key to constructive learning, and online programs engage distributed learning cohorts.  Hence, online programs include asynchronous interaction in media such as e-mail, chats, boards, stored voice, archives, and so on.  Occasionally, synchronous interactions may occur.  Typically, courses define starting and ending dates in an academic calendar. Learners appreciate faculty who help them think creatively, change opinions and sharpen analyses, and encourage them to take responsibility for their own learning by helping them plan and produce meaningful work.  As consumers, learners are satisfied when program information and institutional services — including feedback, tutorials, learning resources, advising, mentoring, testing, readiness and career placement, grade and transfer credit and transcript reporting, degree conferrals, and technologies — are clear, responsive, timely, personalized, and easily accessible.  Metrics may analyze and apply the results of student and alumni surveys, referrals, testimonials and bequests as measures of perceived satisfaction with institutional quality. 

These principles of effective online education address STUDENT SATISFACTION:

  • Advertising, recruiting and admissions materials clearly and accurately represent the program and the services available.
  • Program or course announcements and electronic catalog entries provide appropriate information.
  • The institution has admission/acceptance criteria to assess whether the student has the background, knowledge and technical skills required for undertaking the course program.
  • The program or course provides students with clear, complete and timely information on the curriculum, course and degree requirements, nature of faculty/student interaction, prerequisite technology competencies and skills, technical equipment requirements, availability of academic support services, financial aid resources, and costs and payment policies.
  • The institution evaluates program and course effectiveness, including student satisfaction.
  • At the completion of the program or course, the institution provides for assessment and documentation of student achievement in each course.

ACCESSprovides the means for all qualified, motivated learners to complete courses, degrees, and programs in disciplines of their choice.  The purpose is to broaden access to higher education, so courses are accessible without special purpose equipment beyond a web-enabled computer and at least a telephone connection to the Internet.  Online offerings do not require face-to-face meetings, though exceptions might include relatively brief visits to on-campus educational events, or to a nearby campus, or to a regional center, or to another location.  The goal of access means continually improving software, hardware and uptime; enhancing collaboration and communication among faculty and learners; and improving support services for greater access to education.  Access includes portal and server reliability; consistent look and feel of design; intuitive navigability; clear information including responsibilities, incoming qualifications and expected outcomes; affordability; program choices and flexibility; relevant curricula; rapid and liberal transfer credit; security for testing and for personal and financial information; and the institution’s cultural and fiscal commitment to enabling completion.

These principles of effective online education address ACCESS: 

  • The program or course evaluates the adequacy of access to learning resources and the cost to learners for access to those resources.  It also documents the use of electronic resources.
  • Enrolled students have reasonable and adequate access to support services and appropriate learning resources. 
  • The program or course ensures that appropriate learning resources are available to learners. 
  • The course or program provides for appropriate interaction between faculty and learners and among learners.
  • Review and approval processes ensure the appropriateness of the technology used for meeting program or course objectives. 

Just as access can motivate learners, unreliable access can demotivate them.

ACCESS includes support services for:

  • Admissions and registration
  • Academic advising
  • Technical support services (online and in person help) 
  • Server/portal access
  • Rapid textbooks/learning materials delivery or exchange
  • Learning resource services and library
  • Degree/program mentoring,
  • Standards of progress tracking 
  • Readiness and aptitude testing
  • Tutoring
  • Testing, exam proctoring
  • Financial aid
  • Placement
  • Commencement
  • Alumni

FACULTY SATISFACTIONmeans that faculty find online teaching effective and professionally beneficial.  The availability of qualified and enthusiastic faculty enables institutions to respond to growing demands for online learning and to maintain and improve the quality of learning effectiveness.  Faculty satisfaction assures that the credentials of online faculty are equivalent to those of faculty teaching face-to-face; that online faculty is made up of a similar mix of full and part-time faculty; that online class size (student/faculty ratio) is approximately the same as face-to-face classes (or the institution documents how   alternative methods achieve equivalent or better quality); that online instruction is faculty-led; and that online faculty actively engage in governance, especially in determining program and course content,  design, delivery, assessment, and improvement.  Online faculty share the same responsibilities, authority, academic freedom, and prerogatives as faculty teaching face-to-face.  Important elements of online faculty satisfaction are opportunities for quality interaction with students and greater diversity of students; and greater opportunities for leadership, research, publication, recognition, collegiality, and professional development.  Incentives for online teaching recognize the greater time commitment that is often involved in online teaching and in continuous course improvement with rewards at least equivalent to those for other teaching modes.  Recognizing that online education generally is more time intensive than face-to-face teaching, the institution provides online faculty with adequate preparation and course delivery time.  The institution provides training in online teaching techniques and technical support. Metrics may include institutional surveys that show increasing overall faculty approval of online learning. 

These principles of effective online education address FACULTY SATISFACTION:

  • The institution provides faculty support services specifically related to teaching online.
  • The institution ensures appropriate training for faculty who teach using technology.
  • The institution provides faculty with adequate equipment, software and communications for interaction with students, institutions and other faculty.
  • The course or program provides for appropriate interaction between faculty and students and among students. 
  • Qualified faculty provide appropriate supervision and control of the online program and course.
  • Policies for faculty evaluation include appropriate recognition of teaching and scholarly activities related to programs or courses offered electronically.

COST EFFECTIVENESS strengthens the institution by enabling it to provide its best educational value to learners, and to scale its programs in response to market demand.  Online programs are regionally (and otherwise as applicable) accredited in the same way as on campus courses are, and generally, online courses are part of a complete degree or certificate program.  Assessment is central to cost effectiveness in measuring learning effectiveness and guiding institutional commitment to continuous improvement.  The goal is to control costs so that tuition is affordable yet sufficient to meet maintenance and development costs and to provide a return on investment in startup and infrastructure.  Planning for growth and for improving effectiveness in online programs generally improves pedagogy institution-wide.  Metrics may compare the costs and benefits of delivery modes by discipline and educational level, by faculty salary and workload, by capital, physical plant and maintenance investments, by equipment and communications technology costs, by scalability options, and by learning processes and outcomes, satisfaction levels, retention, and more.  Such comparisons enable institutions to make more better strategic plans for market demand and capture, to achieve capacity enrollment, to develop brand recognition, and to secure long-term loyalty among current and prospective constituents.  Cost effectiveness in online programs offers opportunities to leverage resources by sharing effective practices.  The institution commits to continuous improvements that lower cost while improving learning effectiveness.  Best practices include investment in the use of information technology to achieve these goals.

These principles of effective online education address COST EFFECTIVENESS

  • The program or course is consistent with the institution’s role and mission.  Institutions seeking new opportunities outside their traditional venues will also be given encouragement.
  • Advertising, recruiting and admissions materials clearly and accurately represent the program and the services available.
  • Review and approval processes ensure the appropriateness of the technology being used to meet program or course objectives.  Research, experimentation, and continuous improvement are encouraged.
  • The institution demonstrates a commitment to ongoing support, both financial and technical, and the continuation of the program or course for a period sufficient for students to complete a degree or certificate.

[1]The quality framework is drawn from the work of these organizations:

American Council of Education, http://www.acenet.edu/calec/dist_learning/dl_orgCommitment.html

American Distance Education Consortium, http://www.adec.edu

Institute for Higher Education/NEA Benchmarks, http://www.ihep.com/PR17.html

Southern Regional Electronic Campus Principles of Good Practice, http://www.electroniccampus.org/student/srecinfo/publications/principles.asp

Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications' Principles of Good Practice for Electronically Offered Academic Degree and Certificate Programs, http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/projects/balancing/principles.htm

The Sloan Consortium, http://www.sloan-c.org/catalog/alncriteria.htm

The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, http://www.aln.org

ACCESS

Goal

Process/Practice

Metric

Progress Indices

All learners who are qualified and motivated are enabled to succeed and complete a course/degree/ program through online access to learning in any discipline (continually enlarging the pool of learners).

Program Entry

Processes inform learners of opportunities, and ensure that qualified, motivated learners have reliable access.

Student Support Services 

Integrated support services are available online to learners

Technical infrastructure– Technical infrastructure, including physical plant, staffing and technical assistance assures maintenance and expansion of program offerings

Program expansion– Processes assure program expansion while maintaining existing support structure and overall program quality.

Administrative and technical infrastructureprovides access to all prospective and enrolled learners

Quality metrics measure

*information dissemination; learning resources delivery;  and tutoring services

*Timely web portal content updating

*ISP – POP reliability

*Growth of programs

*Program capacity as a percentage of known (or estimated) total demand

*Program enrollment as a percentage of program capacity, and program enrollment relative to program candidates

Unfulfilled demand declines

Comparative retention and completion rates

Performance feedback from learners

Qualitative indicators show continuous improvement in growth and effectiveness rates that substantiate goal

Admission/Transfer credit evaluation/ Student Agreements issued within # days

Incomplete grade advising within # days

Reliable, timely information and delivery of learning materials

Within #days of registration

Grade reporting within # days

Transcripts within#days

Virtual classroom software accounts

Virtual classroom softwareavailability

                                                                                   

LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS

Goal

Process/Practice

Metric

Progress Indices

Quality of learning online is demonstrated as at least as good as the quality the institution provides in traditional programs

Academic integrity and control reside with faculty in the same way as for traditional programs at that institution.

Online faculty have equivalent inputs to learning process  (e.g. faculty mix, student attainment, class size, cohorts, etc).  Online course is seamless with on-campus offering.

Academic outcomes are measured and adjusted accordingly.

Faculty perception surveys or sampled interviews compare learning effectiveness in delivery modes

Analysis of reasons for withdrawal

Mid-term and end of course learning assessments, e.g. exams.

Learner/graduate/employer focus groups or sampled interviews

Faculty report online learning is equivalent or better

Direct assessment of student learningis equivalent or better

 

FACULTY SATISFACTION

Goal

Process/Practice

Metric

Progress Indices

Sustain and increase faculty participation in online teaching

Expand and deepen faculty awareness of and satisfaction with online teaching

Integrate faculty online and face to face with online purposes and practices

Process to ensure faculty participation in matters particular to online education (e.g. governance, intellectual property, royalty sharing, etc.)

Process to ensure adequate support for faculty in course preparation and course delivery

Mechanisms are in place at institution to communicate information to participating faculty

Faculty give input into the integration of support services for online students to ensure comparability with services for face to face students

Participation in faculty orientation in person, online or via CD

Continuous faculty feedback mechanism

Repeat teaching of online courses by individual faculty

Addition of new faculty

Post-course survey of all faculty about their experience teaching in online programs, preparation/readiness of students, quality and level of support services, etc.

Data from post-course surveys show continuous improvement:

At least #% of faculty believe the overall teaching/learning experience is positive

Willingness/desire to teach additional courses in the program:  #% positive

Faculty report integration of services for students are appropriately integrated:  #% positive

Faculty report understanding of online preparation, support, and delivery:  #% positive.

#% participation in training, orientation program and in continuing information dissemination.

STUDENT SATISFACTION

Goal

Process/Practice

Metric

Progress Indices

Every learner who completes a course is satisfied with:

* Level of interaction with faculty and other students

* Learning outcomes matching the course description

* Adequacy of technological support and appropriateness of use of technologies for the course

Faculty/learner interaction is provided timely and substantive

Adequate and fair systems assess course learning objectives; results are used for improving learning

Courses are appropriately rigorous, fair, and effective in supporting learning

Learners are given realistic estimates of time commitments.

Surveys (see above) and/or interviews

Alumni surveys, referrals, testimonials

Outcomes measures

Focus groups

Faculty/Mentor/Advisor perceptions

Satisfaction measures show continuously increasing improvement

Institutional surveys, interviews, and/or other metrics show satisfaction levels are equivalent to or better than those of other delivery modes for the institution

Interaction items on learner surveys evidence continuing improvement.

Course evaluation items on learner surveys evidence continuing improvement.

Declining drop out rates



COST EFFECTIVENESS

Goal

Process/Practice

Metric

Progress Indices

Institutional business practices generate and support stable, high-quality educational programs and expansion to meet needs

Through institutional research and sharing of effective practices, programs show continuously improving effectiveness and lowering of costs

Tuition for students in online courses is equivalent or less than tuition for students in on-campus programs and costs to develop and deliver online education are kept low so that the program is profitable to institutions

The institution demonstrates financial and technical commitment to its online programs

The institution continuously seeks ways to lower costs and improve quality of course development, course delivery, infrastructure and administrative processes.The institution leverages technologyto reduce costs and improve effectivenessThe institution adopts an activity-based business plan (private) broken outto the course level.  The business plan includes risk capital for investments in continuously improving the pedagogical gain-to-cost ratioThe institution prices courses and programs to provide best value to learnersand to offset institutional development and delivery costs  (See for example http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/projects/tcm/ for a cost model) Course offerings are designed to be scalableand sustainable to meet anticipated demandsTuition rates provide a fair return to the institution and best value to learners at the same timeTuition rates are equivalent or less than on-campus tuition

Institutional stakeholders show support for participation in online educationInnovations adopted.Effective practices identified.The institution maintains or increases levels of participationLearners complete degree programs There is clear evidence of the prospective sustainability of each programCost model ($ return to faculty, department, institution, cost per credit hour, cost per student)Investment costs, e.g. course development, are controlled and recoveredEnrollments equal institutions’ expectations.

As enrollment increases, cost per credit hour decreasesInstitution has assets (faculty, administrators, technology infrastructure, etc.) to sustain growing programsReturn on investment, e.g. Internal Rate of Return or Net Present Value analysis

The institution sustains the program, expands and scales upward as desired, strengthens and disseminates its mission and core values through online education