QUALITY FRAMEWORK FOR ONLINE EDUCATION
The quality framework is a tool for continuously improving online programs
in higher education. Based on recommendations of the higher education
community,[1] the quality framework provides ways of demonstrating
institutional quality. As institutions continuously improve pedagogy,
and as technology evolves, the framework itself is a work in progress,
designed to facilitate the sharing of effective practices among institutions.
Readers are invited to comment on the framework and to share effective
practices at:
http://www.sloanconsortium.org/effectivepractices
Specific structures, known as the five pillars of quality, support the
quality framework-- learning effectiveness, access, student satisfaction,
faculty satisfaction, and cost effectiveness. For each of the pillars,
the framework enables institutions to set the goals, to identify supporting
practices, and to project and measure progress towards the goals. (An
example framework is tabularized at the end of this document). The pillars
of the quality framework are to be understood and applied by each institution
as appropriate to its distinctive quality. These are the pillars of the
quality framework:
LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS means that learners who complete
an online program receive educations that represent the distinctive quality
of the institution. The goal is that online learning is equivalent to
or better than learning through the institution’s other delivery modes,
in particular through its traditional face-to-face, classroom-based instruction.
The course or program is designed to be at least equivalent in quality
to face-to-face courses offered at the same institution. If there is
no comparable face-to-face course, then the institution’s normative benchmark
applies. The learning resources in online courses generally include the
same ones to be found in the institution’s traditional face-to-face courses--
learning media (books, notes, software, CD-ROMs, and so on); faculty who
teach the class and are available outside of class; and learners who interact
with the faculty and with each other. Because of technology, online courses
are usually enhanced by resources available over the Internet and/or designed
for computer presentation. Metrics demonstrate that the quality of learning
online is at least as good as the institution provides through its traditional
programs as measured by several means—by faculty perception; by outcomes
assessments; by career, scholastic and professional achievement surveys
and records; by feedback from employers; and by institutionally sustained,
evidence-based, participatory inquiry into how well online programs achieve
learning objectives. Online learning generally parallels the quality
of face-to-face learning with equivalent content, standards, and support
services. Online curricula are subject to, and thereby receive the same
benefits of practice, process and criteria that the institution applies
to traditional forms of instruction.
These principles of effective online education address LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS:
- Academic standards for all online programs or courses are the same
as those for other courses or programs delivered at the institution
where they originate.
- Online degrees, certificate programs, and courses are coherent and
complete.
- Each program or course of study results in learning appropriate to
the rigor and breadth of the degree or certificate awarded.
- Learning in online programs or courses is comparable to learning in
programs or courses offered at the campus where they originate.
- The institution has admission/acceptance criteria to assess whether
the learner has the background, knowledge and technical skills required
for undertaking the course program.
- The institution uses evaluation results for continuous program improvement.
- The program or course provides learners with clear, complete and timely
information on the curriculum, course and degree requirements, nature
of faculty/learner interaction, prerequisite technology competencies
and skills, technical equipment requirements, availability of academic
support services, financial aid resources, and costs and payment policies.
- The course or program provides for interaction between faculty and
learners and among learners that is both quantitatively and qualitatively
sufficient to support course objectives and that is in accordance with
the pedagogy and subject matter of the course. Interaction encourages
critical thinking, problem solving, analysis, integration and synthesis,
as defined in the course objectives.
- Qualified faculty supervise the online program or course, as they
do for other modes of instruction.
STUDENT SATISFACTION Student satisfaction is the most important
key to continuing learning. It reflects learners’ evaluation of the quality
of all aspects of the educational program. The goal is that all learners
who complete online courses with the same institution express satisfaction
with course quality, with faculty and peer interaction, and with support
services. Online learners put a primary value on constructive, substantive
interaction with faculty and, as appropriate, with classmates in classes
that are the same size as equivalent face-to-face classes and are taught
by the same kind of faculty.People-to-people interaction is key to constructive
learning, and online programs engage distributed learning cohorts. Hence,
online programs include asynchronous interaction in media such as e-mail,
chats, boards, stored voice, archives, and so on. Occasionally, synchronous
interactions may occur. Typically, courses define starting and ending
dates in an academic calendar. Learners appreciate faculty who help them
think creatively, change opinions and sharpen analyses, and encourage
them to take responsibility for their own learning by helping them plan
and produce meaningful work. As consumers, learners are satisfied when
program information and institutional services — including feedback, tutorials,
learning resources, advising, mentoring, testing, readiness and career
placement, grade and transfer credit and transcript reporting, degree
conferrals, and technologies — are clear, responsive, timely, personalized,
and easily accessible. Metrics may analyze and apply the results of student
and alumni surveys, referrals, testimonials and bequests as measures of
perceived satisfaction with institutional quality.
These principles of effective online education address STUDENT SATISFACTION:
- Advertising, recruiting and admissions materials clearly and accurately
represent the program and the services available.
- Program or course announcements and electronic catalog entries provide
appropriate information.
- The institution has admission/acceptance criteria to assess whether
the student has the background, knowledge and technical skills required
for undertaking the course program.
- The program or course provides students with clear, complete and timely
information on the curriculum, course and degree requirements, nature
of faculty/student interaction, prerequisite technology competencies
and skills, technical equipment requirements, availability of academic
support services, financial aid resources, and costs and payment policies.
- The institution evaluates program and course effectiveness, including
student satisfaction.
- At the completion of the program or course, the institution provides
for assessment and documentation of student achievement in each course.
ACCESSprovides the means for all qualified, motivated learners
to complete courses, degrees, and programs in disciplines of their choice.
The purpose is to broaden access to higher education, so courses are accessible
without special purpose equipment beyond a web-enabled computer and at
least a telephone connection to the Internet. Online offerings do not
require face-to-face meetings, though exceptions might include relatively
brief visits to on-campus educational events, or to a nearby campus, or
to a regional center, or to another location. The goal of access means
continually improving software, hardware and uptime; enhancing collaboration
and communication among faculty and learners; and improving support services
for greater access to education. Access includes portal and server reliability;
consistent look and feel of design; intuitive navigability; clear information
including responsibilities, incoming qualifications and expected outcomes;
affordability; program choices and flexibility; relevant curricula; rapid
and liberal transfer credit; security for testing and for personal and
financial information; and the institution’s cultural and fiscal commitment
to enabling completion.
These principles of effective online education address ACCESS:
- The program or course evaluates the adequacy of access to learning
resources and the cost to learners for access to those resources. It
also documents the use of electronic resources.
- Enrolled students have reasonable and adequate access to support services
and appropriate learning resources.
- The program or course ensures that appropriate learning resources
are available to learners.
- The course or program provides for appropriate interaction between
faculty and learners and among learners.
- Review and approval processes ensure the appropriateness of the technology
used for meeting program or course objectives.
Just as access can motivate learners, unreliable access can demotivate
them.
ACCESS includes support services for:
- Admissions and registration
- Academic advising
- Technical support services (online and in person help)
- Server/portal access
- Rapid textbooks/learning materials delivery or exchange
- Learning resource services and library
- Degree/program mentoring,
- Standards of progress tracking
- Readiness and aptitude testing
- Tutoring
- Testing, exam proctoring
- Financial aid
- Placement
FACULTY SATISFACTIONmeans that faculty find online
teaching effective and professionally beneficial. The availability of
qualified and enthusiastic faculty enables institutions to respond to
growing demands for online learning and to maintain and improve the quality
of learning effectiveness. Faculty satisfaction assures that the credentials
of online faculty are equivalent to those of faculty teaching face-to-face;
that online faculty is made up of a similar mix of full and part-time
faculty; that online class size (student/faculty ratio) is approximately
the same as face-to-face classes (or the institution documents how alternative
methods achieve equivalent or better quality); that online instruction
is faculty-led; and that online faculty actively engage in governance,
especially in determining program and course content, design, delivery,
assessment, and improvement. Online faculty share the same responsibilities,
authority, academic freedom, and prerogatives as faculty teaching face-to-face.
Important elements of online faculty satisfaction are opportunities for
quality interaction with students and greater diversity of students; and
greater opportunities for leadership, research, publication, recognition,
collegiality, and professional development. Incentives for online teaching
recognize the greater time commitment that is often involved in online
teaching and in continuous course improvement with rewards at least equivalent
to those for other teaching modes. Recognizing that online education
generally is more time intensive than face-to-face teaching, the institution
provides online faculty with adequate preparation and course delivery
time. The institution provides training in online teaching techniques
and technical support. Metrics may include institutional surveys that
show increasing overall faculty approval of online learning.
These principles of effective online education address FACULTY SATISFACTION:
- The institution provides faculty support services specifically related
to teaching online.
- The institution ensures appropriate training for faculty who teach
using technology.
- The institution provides faculty with adequate equipment, software
and communications for interaction with students, institutions and other
faculty.
- The course or program provides for appropriate interaction between
faculty and students and among students.
- Qualified faculty provide appropriate supervision and control of
the online program and course.
- Policies for faculty evaluation include appropriate recognition of
teaching and scholarly activities related to programs or courses offered
electronically.
COST EFFECTIVENESS strengthens the institution by enabling it
to provide its best educational value to learners, and to scale its programs
in response to market demand. Online programs are regionally (and otherwise
as applicable) accredited in the same way as on campus courses are, and
generally, online courses are part of a complete degree or certificate
program. Assessment is central to cost effectiveness in measuring learning
effectiveness and guiding institutional commitment to continuous improvement.
The goal is to control costs so that tuition is affordable yet sufficient
to meet maintenance and development costs and to provide a return on investment
in startup and infrastructure. Planning for growth and for improving
effectiveness in online programs generally improves pedagogy institution-wide.
Metrics may compare the costs and benefits of delivery modes by discipline
and educational level, by faculty salary and workload, by capital, physical
plant and maintenance investments, by equipment and communications technology
costs, by scalability options, and by learning processes and outcomes,
satisfaction levels, retention, and more. Such comparisons enable institutions
to make more better strategic plans for market demand and capture, to
achieve capacity enrollment, to develop brand recognition, and to secure
long-term loyalty among current and prospective constituents. Cost effectiveness
in online programs offers opportunities to leverage resources by sharing
effective practices. The institution commits to continuous improvements
that lower cost while improving learning effectiveness. Best practices
include investment in the use of information technology to achieve these
goals.
These principles of effective online education address COST EFFECTIVENESS
- The program or course is consistent with the institution’s role and
mission. Institutions seeking new opportunities outside their traditional
venues will also be given encouragement.
- Advertising, recruiting and admissions materials clearly and accurately
represent the program and the services available.
- Review and approval processes ensure the appropriateness of the technology
being used to meet program or course objectives. Research, experimentation,
and continuous improvement are encouraged.
- The institution demonstrates a commitment to ongoing support, both
financial and technical, and the continuation of the program or course
for a period sufficient for students to complete a degree or certificate.
[1]The quality framework is drawn from the work of these organizations:
American Council of Education, http://www.acenet.edu/calec/dist_learning/dl_orgCommitment.html
American Distance Education Consortium, http://www.adec.edu
Institute for Higher Education/NEA Benchmarks, http://www.ihep.com/PR17.html
Southern Regional Electronic Campus Principles of Good Practice,
http://www.electroniccampus.org/student/srecinfo/publications/principles.asp
Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications' Principles of
Good Practice for Electronically Offered Academic Degree and Certificate
Programs, http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/projects/balancing/principles.htm
The Sloan Consortium, http://www.sloan-c.org/catalog/alncriteria.htm
The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, http://www.aln.org
ACCESS
|
|
Goal
|
Process/Practice
|
Metric
|
Progress Indices
|
| |
|
|
|
|
All learners who are qualified and motivated are enabled to succeed
and complete a course/degree/ program through online access to
learning in any discipline (continually enlarging the pool of
learners).
|
Program Entry
Processes inform learners of opportunities, and ensure that qualified,
motivated learners have reliable access.
Student Support Services
Integrated support services are available online to learners
Technical infrastructure– Technical infrastructure, including
physical plant, staffing and technical assistance assures maintenance
and expansion of program offerings
Program expansion– Processes assure program expansion
while maintaining existing support structure and overall program
quality.
|
Administrative and technical infrastructureprovides access to
all prospective and enrolled learners
Quality metrics measure
*information dissemination; learning resources delivery; and
tutoring services
*Timely web portal content updating
*ISP – POP reliability
*Growth of programs
*Program capacity as a percentage of known (or estimated) total
demand
*Program enrollment as a percentage of program capacity, and
program enrollment relative to program candidates
Unfulfilled demand declines
Comparative retention and completion rates
Performance feedback from learners
|
Qualitative indicators show continuous improvement in growth
and effectiveness rates that substantiate goal
Admission/Transfer credit evaluation/ Student Agreements issued
within # days
Incomplete grade advising within # days
Reliable, timely information and delivery of learning materials
Within #days of registration
Grade reporting within # days
Transcripts within#days
Virtual classroom software accounts
Virtual classroom softwareavailability
|
|
|
LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS
|
|
Goal
|
Process/Practice
|
Metric
|
Progress Indices
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Quality of learning online is demonstrated as at least as good
as the quality the institution provides in traditional programs
|
Academic integrity and control reside with faculty in the same
way as for traditional programs at that institution.
Online faculty have equivalent inputs to learning process (e.g.
faculty mix, student attainment, class size, cohorts, etc). Online
course is seamless with on-campus offering.
Academic outcomes are measured and adjusted accordingly.
|
Faculty perception surveys or sampled interviews compare learning
effectiveness in delivery modes
Analysis of reasons for withdrawal
Mid-term and end of course learning assessments, e.g. exams.
Learner/graduate/employer focus groups or sampled interviews
|
Faculty report online learning is equivalent or better
Direct assessment of student learningis equivalent or better
|
| |
FACULTY SATISFACTION
|
|
Goal
|
Process/Practice
|
Metric
|
Progress Indices
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Sustain and increase faculty participation in online teaching
Expand and deepen faculty awareness of and satisfaction with
online teaching
Integrate faculty online and face to face with online purposes
and practices
|
Process to ensure faculty participation in matters particular
to online education (e.g. governance, intellectual property, royalty
sharing, etc.)
Process to ensure adequate support for faculty in course preparation
and course delivery
Mechanisms are in place at institution to communicate information
to participating faculty
Faculty give input into the integration of support services for
online students to ensure comparability with services for face
to face students
Participation in faculty orientation in person, online or via
CD
Continuous faculty feedback mechanism
|
Repeat teaching of online courses by individual faculty
Addition of new faculty
Post-course survey of all faculty about their experience teaching
in online programs, preparation/readiness of students, quality
and level of support services, etc.
|
Data from post-course surveys show continuous improvement:
At least #% of faculty believe the overall teaching/learning
experience is positive
Willingness/desire to teach additional courses in the program:
#% positive
Faculty report integration of services for students are appropriately
integrated: #% positive
Faculty report understanding of online preparation, support,
and delivery: #% positive.
#% participation in training, orientation program and in continuing
information dissemination.
|
STUDENT SATISFACTION
|
|
Goal
|
Process/Practice
|
Metric
|
Progress Indices
|
|
Every learner who completes a course is satisfied with:
* Level of interaction with faculty and other students
* Learning outcomes matching the course description
* Adequacy of technological support and appropriateness of use
of technologies for the course
|
Faculty/learner interaction is provided timely and substantive
Adequate and fair systems assess course learning objectives;
results are used for improving learning
Courses are appropriately rigorous, fair, and effective in supporting
learning
Learners are given realistic estimates of time commitments.
|
Surveys (see above) and/or interviews
Alumni surveys, referrals, testimonials
Outcomes measures
Focus groups
Faculty/Mentor/Advisor perceptions
|
Satisfaction measures show continuously increasing improvement
Institutional surveys, interviews, and/or other metrics show
satisfaction levels are equivalent to or better than those of
other delivery modes for the institution
Interaction items on learner surveys evidence continuing improvement.
Course evaluation items on learner surveys evidence continuing
improvement.
Declining drop out rates
|
COST EFFECTIVENESS
|
|
Goal
|
Process/Practice
|
Metric
| Progress
Indices
|
| |
|
| |
|
Institutional business practices generate and support stable,
high-quality educational programs and expansion to meet needs
Through institutional research and sharing of effective practices,
programs show continuously improving effectiveness and lowering
of costs
Tuition for students in online courses is equivalent or less
than tuition for students in on-campus programs and costs to develop
and deliver online education are kept low so that the program
is profitable to institutions
|
The institution demonstrates financial and technical commitment
to its online programs
The institution continuously seeks ways to lower costs and improve
quality of course development, course delivery, infrastructure
and administrative processes.The institution leverages technologyto
reduce costs and improve effectivenessThe institution adopts an
activity-based business plan (private) broken outto the course
level. The business plan includes risk capital for investments
in continuously improving the pedagogical gain-to-cost ratioThe
institution prices courses and programs to provide best value
to learnersand to offset institutional development and delivery
costs (See for example http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/projects/tcm/ for a cost model)
Course offerings are designed to be scalableand sustainable to
meet anticipated demandsTuition rates provide a fair return to
the institution and best value to learners at the same timeTuition
rates are equivalent or less than on-campus tuition
|
Institutional stakeholders show support for participation in
online educationInnovations adopted.Effective practices identified.The
institution maintains or increases levels of participationLearners
complete degree programs There is clear evidence of the prospective
sustainability of each programCost model ($ return to faculty,
department, institution, cost per credit hour, cost per student)Investment
costs, e.g. course development, are controlled and recoveredEnrollments
equal institutions’ expectations.
As enrollment increases, cost per credit hour decreasesInstitution
has assets (faculty, administrators, technology infrastructure,
etc.) to sustain growing programsReturn on investment, e.g. Internal
Rate of Return or Net Present Value analysis
| The institution sustains the program, expands and scales upward
as desired, strengthens and disseminates its mission and core
values through online education
|
|