 |
IDEAL2 Videoconference Evaluation Questions |
Following are the evaluation questions for the April 13, 2000 IDEAL2
Videoconference. Site conveners should
print this page prior to the conference to use as a tool to engage your
site's participants
in discussing their answers. Following the conference, an on-line evaluation
form will be available for site conveners to enter
the evaluation input from their site.
For more information on this conference, see the
IDEAL2 Videoconference Information page.
If there are questions about this evaluation process, please
E-mail Site Manager:
webmaster@adec.edu
or call us at (402) 472-7000.
Evaluation:
Please rank your responses to the following statements
1-5 with 1 being the lowest ranking and 5 the highest.
1. The program made appropriate use of a variety of resources
and media.
(low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
2. We were actively engaged in this experience.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
3. The experience had a clear purpose.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
4. We found the presentations and activities interesting.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
5. The presentations and activities were relevant to our
institution.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
6. The presentations and activities were of practical
value to our institution.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
7. The supplemental materials were helpful.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
8. The subject was intellectually stimulating.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)
Please respond yes or not to the following statements. Comments are appreciated where applicable.
9. The program was worth attending.
Yes
No
10. The length of the program was appropriate.
Yes
No
11. The pacing of the program was appropriate.
Yes
No
12. The level of detail of the subject matter was about
right. (Please comment.)
Yes
No
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
13. The program contained content of sufficient depth
and detail so as to meet the objectives. (Please comment.)
Yes
No
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
14. The program met our needs.(Please comment.)
Yes
No
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
15. The program met the expectations of our site. (Please
comment.)
Yes
No
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
16. This program contributed to our ability as an institution
to work through issues related to distance education.
Yes
No
How? (Please comment.)
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
17. Describe two or three of the most positive aspects
of this program.
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
18. Please recommend changes or improvements for future
programs of this type.
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
19. Please rate these program components:
a) Program format and moderation
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)b) Case study: "Just Doing It - Leaving Turf Behind in Kentucky"
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)c) Case study: "TADDA - A Three State Union"
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)d) Case study: "The Great Plains IDEA"
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)e) Case study: "Quality Principles"
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)f) Remarks by invited guests
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)g) Questions/comments/interaction
(low) 1 2 3 4 5 (high)
20. Overall, the program was effective.
(Low)
1
2
3
4
5 (high)